Tuesday, November 6, 2012

The 2012 election is the closest race in 76 years

As Election Day approaches, a review of polling data going back to 1936 shows the race between President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney is the closest in 76 years.

romneyobamaIn many cases, polling isn?t an exact science, and few polls take into account electoral votes, which ultimately decide the winner of the presidential race.

But polls showing the projected popular vote are useful indicators of how the final election will turn out. In other words, polls about the popular vote don?t always pick the winner, but they usually do.

And there hasn?t been a closer election in the polling world since the mid-1930s, when scientific methods were first used to project a presidential winner based on modern sampling techniques.

As of Monday, President Obama has a very slim 0.4 percent lead in the popular vote based on consensus data from Real Clear Politics. Gallup suspended its national tracking polling last week after Hurricane Sandy, but its recent swing state poll shows Obama and Romney tied at 48 percent.

Of the six major national polls taken in November, three show Obama with a slight edge, two show a tied election and one favors Romney. Only one poll, from Pew Research, shows Obama ahead by more than the margin of error in a poll.

In historical terms, looking at past polls from Gallup and two recent consensus polls from Real Clear Politics, it?s the closest election since 2000, when George W. Bush and Al Gore approached Election Day.

The 2000 contest also appears to be the nearest thing to the Obama-Romney campaign if you look at a consensus polling model, instead of Gallup.

Gallup polling from 2000 showed a two-point margin lead for Bush among likely voters and a one-point margin for Gore among registered voters.

We went back to the data for 2000 and did our own Constitution Daily average for the nine major polls taken within a week of Election Day.

2000 Consensus Poll (Bush with positive numbers)
Gallup NYT NBC Zogby Harris ICR ABC Fox Pew Average
2 -1 3 -2 0 -2 3 0 2 0.56%

The consensus poll shows that Bush had a 0.56 percent lead on Gore when numbers from pollsters like Pew and the major TV networks were included. We used the Gallup data that showed Bush?s lead among likely voters, which is how Real Clear Politics accounts for Gallup?s current poll data.

In 1960, John F. Kennedy had a one-point lead over Richard Nixon heading into Election Day, and in 1976, Gerald Ford has a one-point lead over Jimmy Carter. In the 1944 race, Franklin D. Roosevelt led Thomas Dewey by one point heading into Election Day.

In those broad terms, the candidate with the popular-vote polling lead in the closest elections usually finds a path to the White House.

Recent Constitution Daily Stories

Romney?s wildest win scenario features Pennsylvania
10 most unusual celebrity presidential endorsements
Booze on Election Day was an American tradition
FCC ?loophole? may force mobile users to pay for political text ads

Looking at the eight closest elections since 1936, the election of 1976 is the only one where the popular polling leader didn?t win the election. Gallup had Gerald Ford with a one-point lead on Jimmy Carter, but Carter won the popular vote by 2.1 percent.

Of course, in the 2000 race Al Gore won by 0.5 percent of the popular vote but lost in the Electoral College after the Supreme Court?s decision to allow Florida?s electoral votes to stand.

The 1980 election was a bigger aberration for Gallup: it had Ronald Reagan with a three-point lead over Carter, but Reagan won the popular vote by 9.6 percent.

A big factor in the 2000 election was the role of third-party candidate Ralph Nader in Florida, where some Gore followers claimed those votes would have likely headed to Gore if Nader hadn?t sought his own candidacy.

In 2012, third-party candidate Virgil Goode has been discussed as a long-shot factor in Virginia.

However, looking at the polling numbers for swing states, it seems that Tuesday night could easily turn into Wednesday morning for Americans waiting to find out the winner of the election.

At least eight swing states have a polling margin of 3 percent or less, according to Real Clear Politics. And Pennsylvania is a late entry into the undecided category.

If President Obama doesn?t take the trifecta of Ohio, Wisconsin, and Iowa, the election will be decided in Nevada or Colorado, or by a potential examination of provisional ballots in other states.

Scott Bomboy is the editor-in-chief of the National Constitution Center.

Closest Election Day Polls Difference Forecast Winner Actual Winner
2012 Obama-Romney 0.4% ? ?
2000 Bush-Gore 0.6% Bush Bush*
1960 Kennedy-Nixon 1% Kennedy Kennedy
1976 Ford-Carter 1% Ford Carter
1944 FDR-Dewey 1% FDR FDR
1968 Nixon-Humphrey 2% Nixon Nixon
2004 Bush-Kerry 2% Bush Bush
1940 FDR-Wilkie 2% FDR FDR
*Gore won popular vote, Bush won Electoral vote
Also Read

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/why-2012-election-closest-recent-history-175835847.html

matt barkley melanie amaro x factor boise state jordans prometheus movie posterior adam lambert arrested

Online Learning: Udacity and Coursera Comparison | UnCollege

B ecause of the diminishing return on investment and rising costs of going to college, new online learning platforms have emerged recently, enabling people all over the world to take college-level classes in a wide range of subjects. These online classes differ from traditional online classes in many ways:

  • there is no cost to take them
  • the only requirement to enroll is an email address
  • while taught by professors, they are not affiliated with any existing institution
  • enrollment goes into the many thousands of students

In many ways, these classes are better than traditional college classes. Because they are online, you have much more control of their education. For instance, you have the ability to spend as much time as you need in order to gain mastery of the material. In addition, because of the large numbers of students taking these classes, it is very easy to ask and answer questions about the material in the class forums. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that the professor won?t remind you when to turn in assignments or watch the lecture videos, so you have to be motivated enough to do the work by yourself.

The two largest platforms providing these types of online classes are Udacity and Coursera. Below is a comparison of the two:

Udacity Coursera
Founder(s) Sebastian Thrun (left his teaching position at Stanford) Daphne Koller, Andrew Ng (both on a leave of absence from Stanford)
Platform Description ?Down the road ? we aspire to be a complete university, offer classes in every discipline and then degrees? ? David Stavens, Udacity Co-Founder, President, COO?1 ?Our goal is to broaden access to higher education for anyone with a computer and an Internet connection, not to displace existing universities? ? Koller and Ng?3
Platform Info
  • Serves as a job placement service working with over 400 companies?2
  • Not affiliated with any existing institution
  • Classes taught by professors and industry experts
  • Business model:
    • Charging employers for access to high-performing students
    • Charging for in-person certification
  • Partners with existing institutions to provide classes taught by professors in an online format
  • Each student has a profile page with that connects to their other online profiles and includes a list of their Coursera classes
  • No business model yet
Certification
  • 4 levels of certification
  • Minimum requirements varies from class to class
  • $89 for proctored exam
  • Minimum 70% in class required
  • Only one level of certification
Use within existing institutions
  • Various schools are accepting Udacity classes for credit or working with Udacity to develop classes
  • University of Washington, for a fee, will provide supplemental direct instruction and UW credit
Subjects covered (not an exclusive list)
  • CS: Python, Web Apps, HTML5, AI
  • Math: Cryptography, Statistics
  • Physical Science: Physics
  • Math, CS
  • Physical Sciences
  • Social Sciences, Business
  • Humanities
Forums
  • Public ? no login required to view
  • Reputation system lets students gain points and badges for asking and answering questions
  • Professors/TAs monitor forums
  • One central forum; no sub-forums
  • Threads appear in chronological order ? no voting posts up or down
  • Each student had a forum page with all their questions, answers, points, and badges
  • Private ? only viewable when logged in

?

  • Voting system lets most popular/important questions float to the top
  • Professors/TAs monitor forums
  • Average response time: 22 min
  • Forum divided up into sub-forums (ex. Lectures, Quizzes, Technical Issues, etc)
  • Excellent forum search engine
Class Wiki All classes have an editable wiki. Some classes have an editable wiki.
Office Hours Some classes have ?office hours? videos where the professor answers popular questions. Some classes have ?office hours? videos where the professor answers popular questions.

?

This table outlines the specifics of how Udacity and Coursera conduct their classes:

Udacity Coursera
Class Format
  • All work done in-browser
  • All materials released at once
  • Each unit includes:
    • Video-quiz-video-quiz sequence
    • Problem set
  • Self-paced, no deadlines:
    • Completing the final exam is the only requirement for getting a certificate
  • Class material sometimes changes/gets additions
  • Some work done in-browser, some on your local machine
  • New unit released each week
  • Each unit includes:
    • Set of video lectures
    • Problem set and/or written assignments due the following week
  • A few classes are self-paced with no certification option
  • Length of classes: 3 to 15 weeks
  • Offered at scheduled times
  • Static class material
Lesson Format
  • Video-quiz-video-quiz sequence:
    • ~15-20 quizzes
    • ~30 videos, each ~1-5 min in length
  • Translucent hand and electronic pen uses drawing and writing to explain concepts during videos
  • No lecture slides or video of professor lecturing
  • Each quiz and quiz solution is explained in a video
  • Each quiz and problem set can be submitted infinitely many times
  • No peer grading
Videos:
  • Involve lecture slides, electronic pen on a tablet, and/or video of professor lecturing
  • Each video is ~ 5 min ? 1 hour in length
  • Embedded quizzes in videos

Problem sets:

  • Auto-graded
  • Each class specifies the number of times problem sets and assignments can be taken

Peer-grading:

  • Used in humanities classes to grade essays

In the coming weeks I?ll review Udacity and Coursera in more detail, as well as other online learning platforms. In the meantime, feel free to comment below on what you think of these platforms.

This is the first in a series of guest posts by Catherine Stevens covering online education. You can check out her personal site here:?about.me/csrs?

References:
1?http://www.paloaltoonline.com/weekly/story_print.php?story_id=17832
2?http://blog.udacity.com/p/career-team.html
3?http://www.paloaltoonline.com/weekly/story_print.php?story_id=17832

Source: http://www.uncollege.org/online-learning-udacity-and-coursera-comparison/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=online-learning-udacity-and-coursera-comparison

donovan mcnabb donovan mcnabb lottery ticket megga millions what is autism the giver march 30

THE DOORS The Soft Parade (Steve Hoffman remaster) FLAC

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://www.vertor.com/torrents/2814639/THE-DOORS-The-Soft-Parade-(Steve-Hoffman-remaster)-FLAC

blagojevich new mexico state kevin rose sessions march madness scores doonesbury padma lakshmi

Why Google Really Bought Motorola - Business Insider

Google just came out with three new devices, the Nexus 4, 7, and 10?a smartphone and two tablets running its Android operating system.

None of them were made by Google's smartphone-hardware business unit, Motorola Mobility. They're made by Samsung, Asus, and LG.

John Lagerling, director of business development for Android, negotiated the deals with hardware makers. Motorola has no special advantage, he told the New York Times.

"From my perspective as a partnership director, they are another partner," Lagerling said.

Just not a partner deemed worthy, at this time, of making a device that carries the Google brand.

So why did Google pay $12.5 billion for Motorola, if not to get an integrated stack of hardware and software? Read Lagerling's explanation (emphasis added):

The way I understand it is, it?s mostly about the patents, the way you can sort of disarm this huge attack against Android. We talked about prices. There are players in the industry who were unhappy about more competitive pricing for the consumers. They want to keep the prices high, they want to force the price to be so high that operators have to subsidize the devices very highly. That?s not only the Cupertino guys but also for the guys up in Seattle. They want higher margins, they want to charge more for software.

We simply believe there?s a better way of doing it without extracting that much payment from end users, because there are other ways to drive revenues. Patents were used as a weapon to try to stop that evolution and scare people away from lower-cost alternatives. And I think with the Motorola acquisition we?ve shown we?re able to put skin in the game and push back.

(The "Cupertino guys" are Apple and the "guys up in Seattle" are Microsoft, in case Lagerling's oblique references to his competition weren't obvious.)

Now, maybe Lagerling has to bash Motorola a little, downplaying it to keep other Android smartphone manufacturers in the Google camp. But we think that Google's made it pretty clear that it doesn't think much of Motorola's hardware. Motorola has a set-top box business, for example?but that doesn't seem to be a factor in any of Google's TV plans.?It set up manufacturing on the Nexus Q, a quirky video-streaming device?even though, in retrospect, it probably could have used some help, since it ended up putting sales of that device on hold.

When Google closed the Motorola deal, CEO Larry Page praised Dennis Woodside, the longtime Googler he put in charge of the deal. But Woodside's first big hardware launch was a dud. The company is proving more expensive to fix than Google thought. And Motorola dragged down Google's most recent earnings.

Maybe Google will eventually use Motorola to create mobile devices with deeply integrated hardware and software, the way Apple always does and the way Microsoft has started to do with the Surface. But right now, everything Google is saying and doing indicates that Motorola's not up to stuff. It's just a pile of patents, with a flailing business attached.

Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/google-motorola-john-lagerling-android-patents-2012-11

katharine mcphee cold mountain valentines day ideas the villages florida egoraptor gisele bundchen turbotax

Monday, November 5, 2012

Land's End: Additional 30% off + FREE Shipping (No Minimum ...

MidgetMomma by MidgetMomma is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at www.midgetmomm.com.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at www.midgetmomma.com

Copyright 2008-2011

Disclaimer: We share information, we are not responsible for the information that we share and we make no guarantees of the information that we share however we do try our best to make sure information is accurate and up to date. We are not responsible for any damages that are brought to anyone or anything by using this site. User of this site accepts all risks involved with using this www.midgetmomma.com and hold us responsible for nothing. (Read full disclaimer for rest of details) Disclosure:This blog accepts forms of cash compensation from (but not limited to) sponsored posts, advertisements, paid insertions and other forms of compensation. Our content will never be influenced by compensation, and our honest opinions will always be given. This blog is written by individuals who all have their own opinions, all opinions on this blog belong to the author(s) and no one else. (Read full disclosure for rest of details.)

Source: http://www.midgetmomma.com/2012/11/05/lands-end-additional-30-off-free-shipping-no-minimum-womans-gloves-for-3-47-shipped-reg-14-girls-leggings-for-4-19reg-19-boys-long-sleeved-shirts-for-3-47-reg-24-more/

nfl scores redskins Devon Walker Tom Cruise ryan reynolds Star Trek: The Original Series Carlton

Jack Cahn: Mayor Bloomberg Needs to Apologize to City Employees

This week, Hurricane Sandy wreaked havoc on New York City. Schools closed for an entire week -- unheard of in New York City history. The New York Stock Exchange closed for two consecutive days due to weather -- for the first time in over 100 years. The death toll as of November 1, 2012 was 44 lives, and many more injured. Millions of New Yorkers were without power for much of the week, with a video of the explosion of a power generator in lower Manhattan going viral within minutes. Between 80-100 homes were destroyed by the storm, with many more flooded for days. Meanwhile, the New York City subway system was paralyzed on Monday and Tuesday, and access remains limited at the time of this article's writing. Lower Manhattan (Zone A) after being evacuated Monday, continues to have no subway access. The Federal Government was closed on Monday and Tuesday. Amtrak too was closed and trains canceled. It was "a devastating storm, maybe the worst that we have ever experienced," said Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

On Monday, Bloomberg announced: "The storm is here and will be here ... well into tomorrow...Now you should concentrate on keeping yourselves and your family safe to the extent possible." The Office of Emergency Management urged: "Stay indoors, stay away from windows and avoid unnecessary travel, either on foot or by vehicle. If you must go out, make sure all windows are closed and locked and all water faucets are turned off."

Everyone was instructed to be safe and take necessary precautions -- except New York City employees. In an email sent by Chancellor Denis Walcott to administrative staff on Sunday, October 28, he wrote:

"In accordance with city policy, city government is open and all employees who work in central and field offices are expected to try to overcome transportation difficulties caused by the storm and report to work. This includes teachers assigned, Supervisors, Educational Administrators, managers and all other staff working in central and field offices."

This was a very casual email sent during a hectic period of time. It's so outrageous, that seeing it after the fact can't even come close to explaining the audacity and hypocrisy of Mayor Bloomberg and the senior staff of the Department of Education. Let me put it in perspective:

While millions of New Yorkers sat in dark apartments, some without water, heard a power plant exploding nearby, and watched fires destroy close to 100 homes, others were expected to leave their children and loved ones in order to go to work.

Were these first responders, fire fighters, or cops? No, they were members of the New York City's administrative staff (lawyers, social workers, clerical workers, and others).

How could they get to work?

Their options were quite simple. Ride a bike through a hurricane (yes, there were 75 mile-per-hour winds and pouring rain), walk to work (because three hours in the pouring rain is a safe bet), or hitchhike. Any idiot needed only to look out of his window to realize how ridiculous a task this was - not to mention how unsafe any of the available options were.

Just as Mayor Bloomberg, Governor Cuomo, and the Office of Emergency Management were advising people to stay off the streets, avoid transportation, and be cautious, they were sending their own employees to work. Talk about double standards.

What was the penalty for choosing to avoid putting oneself in harm's way by walking to work during a hurricane?

Employees were told that their absence would be counted as personal leave days. I read this as: "You'd better show up to work, and if you don't, we'll mark you absent." An entire city is shut down because of a storm that the Mayor himself describes as one of the worst in the city's history, and employees are penalized for not putting themselves in danger. This is an outrage.

To redress this, Mayor Bloomberg must take three steps.

First, he ought to issue a formal apology to all City employees who were unnecessarily forced either go to work, or use their personal leave days, on Monday and Tuesday. Second, he ought to compensate those who did attend work by paying them for overtime. Finally, he should return the personal leave days to those who chose to stay at home.

Mayor Bloomberg has had a very tough week, and mistakes are a part of the process. The real test, however, is whether he can recognize his mistakes, take responsibility for them, and address them.

?

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jack-cahn/mayor-bloomberg-to-city-employees_b_2067444.html?utm_hp_ref=teen

Walking Dead Season 3 Episode 2 nascar celiac disease dancing with the stars san francisco giants politico Medal of Honor Warfighter

21 animated features vying for Oscar nominations

In this undated publicity photo provided by Paramount Pictures, Sandman eyes his target in DreamWorks Animation's "Rise of the Guardians." ?Brave,? ?Wreck-It Ralph" and "Rise of the Guardians" are among the animated features angling for an Oscar nomination. The motion picture academy said Friday, Nov. 2, 2012, that 21 films have been submitted for consideration in the Academy Awards' animated feature category. (AP Photo/Paramount Pictures, Courtesy DreamWorks Animation, File)

In this undated publicity photo provided by Paramount Pictures, Sandman eyes his target in DreamWorks Animation's "Rise of the Guardians." ?Brave,? ?Wreck-It Ralph" and "Rise of the Guardians" are among the animated features angling for an Oscar nomination. The motion picture academy said Friday, Nov. 2, 2012, that 21 films have been submitted for consideration in the Academy Awards' animated feature category. (AP Photo/Paramount Pictures, Courtesy DreamWorks Animation, File)

FILE - In this undated file film image released by Disney/Pixar, the character Merida, voiced by Kelly Macdonald, follows a Wisp in a scene from "Brave." ?Brave,? ?Wreck-It Ralph" and "Rise of the Guardians" are among the animated features angling for an Oscar nomination. The motion picture academy said Friday, Nov. 2, 2012, that 21 films have been submitted for consideration in the Academy Awards' animated feature category. (AP Photo/Disney/Pixar, File)

LOS ANGELES (AP) ? "Brave," ''Wreck-It Ralph" and "Rise of the Guardians" are among the animated features angling for an Oscar nomination.

The motion picture academy said Friday that 21 films have been submitted for consideration in the Academy Awards' animated feature category.

"Dr. Seuss' The Lorax," ''Frankenweenie," ''Ice Age Continental Drift" and "ParaNorman" are among the high-profile movies vying for one of five nominations. Other contenders include France's "The Rabbi's Cat" and Japan's "From Up on Poppy Hill."

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences says several of the films listed have not yet had their required Los Angeles qualifying runs.

"Rango" won the prize earlier this year after 18 films were in nomination contention.

The 85th annual Academy Awards are set for Feb. 24, 2013, at the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2012-11-02-Oscars-Animated%20Feature/id-85694b108e6748b499cb0ccde1ee1551

google stock google stock china gdp dont trust the b in apartment 23 johnny damon kirk cameron news 10